Asset deal or share deal
In an asset deal, the buyer acquires the land or a share in the property directly. The purchase agreement is subject to the notarial requirement set out in Section 311b of the German Civil Code (BGB). Rights, encumbrances, tenancies and public-law characteristics of the property must be examined individually and addressed in the contract. The risks associated with the property, and in many cases existing tenancies, are transferred to the buyer. The seller’s other business history is not included.
In a share deal, shares in the property holding company are transferred. The land remains the property of the same company. Economically, control over the legal entity changes hands. Along with the property, the buyer also assumes the company’s contracts, liabilities, tax positions, legal disputes and any potential compliance risks. Due diligence must therefore combine property and corporate due diligence. If a limited liability company (GmbH) holds the property, the obligation to transfer its shares generally also requires notarisation in accordance with Section 15 of the German Limited Liability Companies Act (GmbHG).
This structure has significant implications for land transfer tax. The direct acquisition of the land is a taxable transaction under the Land Transfer Tax Act. The acquisition or transfer of shares in property-owning companies may also trigger the tax if the statutory criteria and shareholding thresholds are met. The applicable law operates, amongst other things, with 90 per cent thresholds and multi-year assessment periods. It is therefore incorrect to make a blanket statement that a share deal is ‘exempt from land transfer tax’. The chain of shareholdings, prior transactions, signing, closing and subsequent restructuring must be modelled from a tax perspective before the structure is finalised.
For foreign investors, the question of the acquisition vehicle also arises. A German special-purpose vehicle can facilitate financing, administration and subsequent disposal, but entails its own incorporation, tax and compliance obligations. A direct acquisition, a foreign company or a German special purpose vehicle should be compared in terms of liability, financing, distributions, exit and group requirements. The economically simplest option is not necessarily the best from a tax and legal perspective.
Financing must be considered at an early stage in this decision-making process. Lenders often expect mortgages, assignments of rent receivables, account attachments and other forms of security. In the case of a share deal, share pledges and restrictions under company law are also to be taken into account. The purchase agreement should allow the seller to participate in the financing without exposing them to uncontrolled liability risks. A subsequent change in structure may necessitate the redrafting of notarial documents, a fresh tax analysis and the re-approval of the loan.