Insight

Retention of title and payment security in international trade

Which forms of retention of title are available under German law and how companies can effectively secure payment claims in cross-border transactions.

25 August 2026 | Reading time 3 min. | Author: Martin Neupert

Retention of title is a simple and cost-effective solution, but it is not equally effective in all countries. Supplementary banking instruments offer greater security, but also entail higher costs.

Simple, extended and expanded retention of title

Under a simple retention of title, the goods remain the property of the seller until full payment has been made. This is particularly straightforward to administer, but offers protection only as long as the goods are identifiable in the buyer’s possession. If the goods are resold or processed, the security may become ineffective without additional provisions.

Extended retention of title therefore takes effect at an earlier stage. Typically, it covers the claim arising from resale or the seller’s share in an item created through processing. Extended retention of title, on the other hand, also secures other claims arising from the ongoing business relationship. The broader the scope of the security, the more precisely the scope, the release in the event of over-collateralisation and its inclusion in the general terms and conditions must be formulated.

Payment security in cross-border trade

The choice of suitable security measure depends on the value of the goods, the buyer’s creditworthiness, the destination country and the duration of the business relationship. Retention of title involves little administrative effort and is suitable for ongoing supply relationships. Abroad, however, it is only as strong as the local law on property rights and insolvency. In the case of movable goods in particular, this protection may cease to apply if the goods are processed, mixed or transported to a country that does not recognise the German legal concept.

With a letter of credit, the payment risk is shifted to the banks involved: payment is made upon presentation of the agreed documents. Whilst the administrative burden and bank charges are higher, payment is, however, less dependent on the buyer’s subsequent creditworthiness. A surety or guarantee also creates an additional debtor; however, its value depends on the guarantor’s creditworthiness and the precise terms of the call. In larger transactions, these instruments are frequently combined.

Validity in the case of cross-border transactions and insolvency

Whether a German retention-of-title clause is recognised abroad generally depends on the law of the country in which the goods are located. A clause that is valid under German law may therefore become ineffective as soon as the goods cross the border. Some legal systems require registration, specific wording or individual agreements, whilst others recognise extended or expanded forms only to a limited extent.

In the event of the buyer’s insolvency, the nature of the security measure is decisive in determining whether the seller can reclaim the goods from the estate or merely receive preferential satisfaction from the proceeds of their realisation. In the case of cross-border deliveries, it should therefore be checked in advance where the goods will be used, how they may be processed or resold, and what effect the security measure will have under insolvency law in that jurisdiction. If there are any doubts, a letter of credit or a bank guarantee may be the more reliable solution.

Putting payment security into practice

A robust security arrangement begins with the choice of security instrument. The chosen form of retention of title must be effectively incorporated into the contract and aligned with the flow of goods. For deliveries abroad, it is also necessary to check whether the destination country recognises this arrangement and what formalities are required there. To hedge against credit risks, letters of credit, guarantees, advance payment or credit insurance can be used.

Equally important is comprehensive documentation. Delivery notes, serial numbers, invoices and the allocation of outstanding receivables must clearly show which goods are secured. Only then can the retention of title be effectively enforced in the event of late payment or insolvency.

About the author

Martin Neupert

Partners · Property and Procurement

Get in touch

Martin Neupert advises companies and procurement organisations on all matters relating to procurement, supply and distribution law. His services range from supplier structure and contract standards to quality and liability issues within the supply chain.

Close-up of a red-painted steel girder joint with numerous bolted connections

How to structure payment security in international trade?

Maxfeld.legal draws up retention-of-title and payment security clauses and assesses what actually offers protection in the event of cross-border transactions and insolvency.

Get in touch

Frequently asked questions about retention of title and payment guarantees

What is the difference between a standard retention of title and an extended retention of title?

Simple retention of title covers only the goods delivered until payment has been made. Extended retention of title, on the other hand, also covers the proceeds of resale or the goods that have been processed.

Does the German retention of title also apply abroad?

This does not happen automatically. Whether it is recognised depends on the law of the country in which the matter is situated. In some countries, its effect is limited.

What can be done if the retention of title is unclear?

Whilst banking instruments such as letters of credit or bank guarantees do offer a higher level of security, they are also more labour-intensive and expensive.

What happens if the buyer goes into administration?

Depending on the terms of the agreement, the seller may have a right of separation or a right of exclusion. The exact wording of the clause is decisive.

Does the retention of title have to be included in the terms and conditions?

This should be clearly agreed. In the terms and conditions, the limits on content moderation also apply in the case of the extended reservation.

Retention of title and payment security in international trade

Simple, extended and expanded retention of title

Payment security in cross-border trade

Validity in the case of cross-border transactions and insolvency

Putting payment security into practice

About the author

How to structure payment security in international trade?

Frequently asked questions about retention of title and payment guarantees

More articles on this topic

Get in touch

Maxfeld.legal

Request brochure