Understanding the term sheet
The term sheet summarises the principal commercial and legal terms of the proposed financing. It usually forms the basis for the investment agreement, shareholders' agreement, articles of association and closing documents without itself being the complete contract.
Typical terms include investment amount and funding schedule, pre-money and post-money valuation and investor ownership percentage. The term sheet also covers the size and treatment of the ESOP or VSOP pool, the liquidation preference and anti-dilution protection.
It further addresses information, control and consent rights, management or board representation and founder vesting and leaver provisions. Rights to participate in later rounds, exit, drag-along and tag-along provisions and exclusivity, confidentiality and costs belong there as well.
The signing and closing conditions complete the list.
Is a term sheet binding?
Term sheets are commonly stated to be largely non-binding. This does not mean they have no legal effect.
The following provisions are often binding: confidentiality, exclusivity or no-shop obligations and allocation of transaction costs. The same applies to governing law and jurisdiction, due diligence process provisions and occasionally specific implementation obligations.
Non-binding provisions also have strong practical effect. If a participating 1x liquidation preference has been accepted in the term sheet, it will be difficult to reopen the fundamental question of whether any preference should apply. The long-form agreements will normally develop the agreed commercial framework rather than replace it.
The term sheet should therefore not be treated as a casual expression of intent. It is the stage at which the important commercial points remain negotiable with relatively limited documentation.
Valuation and ownership
Pre-money valuation is the value immediately before the investment. Post-money valuation is generally the pre-money valuation plus the new capital.
By way of example: on a pre-money valuation of EUR 8 million and an investment of EUR 2 million, the post-money valuation is EUR 10 million. The investor's basic ownership is 20 per cent.
This calculation is correct only if no additional dilution applies.
The actual founder dilution is often affected by a new or increased employee pool created before closing, existing convertible loans and outstanding options. Multiple closings or tranches, different share classes and transaction costs economically borne by the company also have an effect.
Whether the employee pool is treated pre-money or post-money is particularly important. A pre-money top-up is economically borne mainly by the existing shareholders and may reduce the founders' percentage materially.
Before signing, the parties should prepare a fully diluted cap table. It should show at least ownership immediately before the round, ownership following the pool increase and conversion of existing instruments. It should also show ownership following closing and the distribution of proceeds at different exit values.
Liquidation preference
The liquidation preference determines the distribution of proceeds on a sale or liquidation. It may be more important economically than the investor's headline ownership percentage.
Under a non-participating 1x preference, the investor generally receives the higher of the original investment amount and the amount payable according to the ordinary ownership percentage.
Under a participating preference, the investor first receives the preference amount and then participates in the remaining proceeds. This can reduce founder proceeds materially at mid-range exit values.
The documents should address preference multiple, participating or non-participating structure and seniority between financing rounds. They should also address treatment of dividends, definition of a liquidity event and ranking of share classes.
Conversion into ordinary shares and the treatment of earn-outs, escrow and rollover consideration also belong on the list.
Waterfall calculations for several exit scenarios should therefore form part of the term sheet analysis.
Anti-dilution protection
Anti-dilution provisions protect investors where a later round takes place at a lower valuation.
Full ratchet. The original issue price is adjusted to the lower price of the new round. This may cause substantial founder dilution.
Weighted average. The adjustment reflects both the lower price and the size of the new issuance and is generally more balanced.
Customary exceptions may include employee equity within the agreed pool, strategic investments and conversion of previously disclosed instruments. They may also include acquisition consideration, corporate reorganisations and issuances approved by the relevant investor majority.
Anti-dilution is different from a participation or pre-emption right. A participation right permits the investor to invest in the next round. Anti-dilution adjusts the economic position following a down round.
Governance and investor rights
Investors commonly require rights beyond their percentage ownership, including consent rights over budgets, financing and major investments, approval of acquisitions and disposals and involvement in appointing management. They also commonly require board or observer rights, regular financial and KPI reporting and access and information rights.
Consent to new share issues and controls over related-party transactions complete the package.
Reserved matters should contain appropriate thresholds and reflect the company's stage. Thresholds that are too low may slow ordinary business. Broad drafting may give the investor an effective veto over day-to-day management.